|
|
THANK
YOU CARICOM -
SAMPLE LETTERS SEND OUT BY LEADERSHIP NETWORK
NOVEMBER,
2004
(COPIES
TO COME)
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
At its last plenary meeting in November 2004, Caricom decided, once
again, NOT to recognize the unconstitutional Latortue regime, citing
Latortue regime's persecution against the Constitutional government's
Lavalas Party. Despite tremendous pressures and intimidation, since
Feb. 29, 2004 and before, on these 15-tiny nation-states, by the world's
greatest powers, they continue to stand firm, refusing to bend to Canada/France/US/UN
and even OAS-will to support "regime change" of an elected
and constitutional government that is part of their Caribbean community
of nations.
*
Guyana president
says Caricom position on Haiti justified
Associated Press - AP
December 07, 2004
GEORGETOWN, Guyana (AP) - Haiti is worse off under its US-backed
government than it was under ousted President Jean-Bertrand Aristide,
said Guyana's President Bharrat Jagdeo, asserting the Caribbean
Community is right not to readmit Haiti to its meetings.
Haiti lost its seat after Aristide was ousted February 29 under
diplomatic pressure and an armed insurrection led by demobilised
soldiers.
Aristide alleges the United States organised his ouster, a charge the
United States denies.
At a Caribbean Community summit last month, Haiti's bid to be
readmitted to meetings was turned down. Leaders cited human rights
and security concerns.
Since July, most Caribbean countries had called for Haiti to retake
its seat. Guyana, St Vincent, and St Lucia have maintained a hard
line.
"The situation has deteriorated, and the same things that the
international community was accusing Aristide of (interim Premier
Gerard) Latortue has done worse," said Jagdeo, speaking on local
television Sunday.
Since September 30, Aristide partisans have stepped up demands for
their leader's return, and more than 100 people have been killed in
politically linked violence in the capital.
Some human rights organisations have taxed the government for
illegally detaining scores of Aristide supporters. The government has
denied the charge, accusing Aristide of orchestrating the violence
from his exile in South Africa, an accusation Aristide denies.
Haiti joined the 15-member Caribbean Community in July 2002. With 8
million people, it more than doubled the population of the regional
organisation.
*******
COHA: CARICOM Spurns
Latortue Once Again
******
Friday, 12 November 2004
********
HAITI: A Brutal Regime Shows Its Colors
CARICOM Spurns Latortue Once Again
Violence and Human Rights Abuses Escalate • On October 9, the
Caribbean Community (CARICOM) voted once again to postpone the resumption
of normal relations with the Washington-installed Haitian government
of Prime Minister Gerard Latortue, citing the latter's campaign of persecution
against ousted President Jean-Bertrand Aristide’s Lavalas Party.
• CARICOM’s diplomatic rebuff is a result of the increasing
violence, instability, arbitrary rule, and human rights abuses in Haiti
during the last six months. This economic and humanitarian disaster
has pushed the country closer to the brink of political chaos than ever
before.
• The UN peacekeeping force MINUSTAH has been fundamentally ineffective
in preserving basic security and human rights in the country, due to
a lack of manpower and political commitment to a proactive UN role in
Haiti. The peacekeeping failure is not the fault of UN representative
Juan Gabriel Valdés, as much as it can be attributed directly
to UN Kofi Annan’s office and the complete deference that the
UN Secretary General has shown Washington policy makers.
• For a speedy return to democracy, a dramatic resuscitation and
expansion of MINUSTAH is needed. Additionally, the UN, the Organization
of American States and Washington must act as one in demanding that
the Latortue government improve its appalling human rights record, instead
of blaming Aristide loyalists for the country’s grievous problems.
• Serious thought should be given to replacing the inept and non-responsive
Latortue regime.
In the eight months since the abrupt resignation, under U.S. pressure,
of former President Jean-Bertrand Aristide of Haiti, the country has
witnessed a steadily escalating level of chaos and lawlessness under
interim Prime Minister Gerard Latortue. Such violence raises fundamental
questions about the Haitian government’s ability to survive, much
less retain any domestic or international legitimacy, outside the Washington
offices of the U.S. policymakers, who hand-picked it, and those at the
OAS and UN who today routinely, even automatically, support Washington’s
highly skewed vision for the island – one dominated by an anti-Aristide
motif. Even for a country with a history of political instability and
violent shifts of power, the absence of effective authority and the
presence of a brutal faction of demobilized soldiers has driven Haiti
to the threshold of volatility usually associated with failed states
such as Somalia, Liberia and Afghanistan.
So far, the UN peacekeeping force MINUSTAH has been grossly unsuccessful
in halting the erosion of central authority, and its stabilization is
likely to fail entirely without the arrival of promised new major troop
units, the embrace of a more aggressive role aimed at disarming armed
factions, and a dramatic increase in pressure by the UN, and Washington,
on the Latortue government to restore order.
The interim government is currently presiding over a regime of human
rights violations comparable, if not more severe, than those perpetrated
by the widely denounced 1991 – 1994 military junta. All Secretary
of State Colin Powell has had to offer at this point are unsubstantiated,
far-flung charges against Aristide for fomenting violence in the country,
which are comparable in their quality of scholarship to his contribution
to the Iraq debate.
Economic Deterioration
It is important to note that in a number of crucial respects, economic
and political conditions in Haiti are even more dire than there were
during the military junta of the early 1990’s. At approximately
80 percent, unemployment is higher today than during the military rule
because of the shrinking of Haiti's export sector, as a result of international
sanctions first put into effect from 1991-94 and the extensive looting
that occurred earlier this year after Aristide’s departure. Rural
destitution is even more acute, exacerbated by widespread deforestation
that has left only two percent of Haiti's arboreal cover standing and
has produced widespread land degradation, which intensified the flooding
that devastated southwest Haiti in May and June, and later sacked Gonaives
as a result of Tropical Storm Jeanne. Neither the Bush administration
nor the UN have criticized the gross incompetence of the Latortue government
in either preparing for or later dealing with Jeanne. One can only imagine
the fierce criticism that would have been visited upon Aristide if he
or one of his Lavalas colleagues were in office at this time.
A Land Without Plenty
The country’s already meager agricultural output has been further
damaged by the government's termination of fertilizer subsidies and
the flooding of the Artibonite Valley region, Haiti’s historic
breadbasket. Declining production and import bottlenecks have sent rice
prices skyrocketing, which has led to serious increases in malnutrition
and infant mortality. Moreover, population migrations, a climate of
virtual impunity among the country’s venal officials and increased
violence, particularly of a sexual nature perpetrated by ex-soldiers
and other armed factions, are expected to exacerbate the country's already
serious HIV/AIDS epidemic. The fight against HIV/AIDS, spearheaded by
the Aristide government, has been severely jeopardized by the ongoing
instability. Equally dangerous is the possibility of outbreaks of other
infectious diseases among the thousands of flood victims from Gonaives
that continue to be housed in squalid and unsanitary conditions, generating
a crisis that is certain to rapidly overwhelm Haiti's frail healthcare
system and meager resources.
Spiraling Violence, Intensifying Human Rights Abuses
Given the severity of the humanitarian crisis, a surge in refugees trying
to reach the Dominican Republic and Florida is inevitable, and is expected
to be particularly severe if the continuous violence between ex-soldiers
and Aristide supporters, which has wracked Port-au-Prince since September
30 and taken more than 80 lives, continues to intensify. While some
of Latortue’s officers have attempted to negotiate the demobilization
of ex-soldiers or their incorporation into the police, the military
faction led by Remissanthe Ravix has shown no signs of acquiescence.
On the contrary, as long as the government continues to ignore their
outrageous demands to reconstitute and provide back pay for the ten
years since the military’s dissolution in 1995, the ex-soldiers
will continue to exert pressure on the hapless Latortue through armed
takeovers of small towns, particularly in Haiti's central plateau. The
poorly-trained and demoralized National Police already has demonstrated
that it lacks the capacity and will to confront the well-armed and well-organized
ex-soldiers, and it is clear that the police will be completely unable
to maintain security if the already tense situation escalates.
As bands of former soldiers freely wreak havoc across the country, the
Latortue government has been at the forefront of an appallingly violent
campaign of repression against Aristide’s political allies and
supporters, unleashing a wave of arbitrary arrests and unexplained killings
in the overwhelmingly pro-Aristide slums.
Such human rights violations and abuses of constitutional norms have
gone completely ignored. Epitomizing the situation is the fact that
a notoriously reprehensible figure like Bernard Gousse holds the portfolio
of Minister of Justice despite his utter disregard for law and morality.
The government invariably justifies its raids as either searches for
illegal guns (although a recent "arms search" in the poor
and pro-Aristide neighborhood of Bel-Air on October 6 produced seventy-five
illegal arrests but no weapons) or as hunts for Latortue-designated
“terrorists,” defined as anyone thinking, planning or somehow
linked to others thinking of violence. The government, outrageously
enough, has also recently arrested and illegally detained a number of
high-profile supporters of Aristide's Lavalas party, including two highly-respected
legislators ,Senator Yvon Feillé and former Deputy Rudy Hérivaux,
nine members of the Confederation of Haitian Workers and leading advocates
of non-violence, like Reverend Gerard Jean-Juste. These victims of Latortue’s
and Gousse’s current reign of terror are in addition to the officials
of the Aristide government, including former Prime Minister Yvon Neptune,
former Minister of the Interior Jocelerme Privert and former Delegate
Jacques Mathier, who disgracefully have been imprisoned without any
charges for months.
Latortue government internationally condemned
Though the U.S. and the UN have been appallingly slow in condemning
the abuses perpetrated by the government that it put in power, other
members of the international community have become increasingly vocal
in denouncing the Latortue government for what it is: an illegally installed,
repressive and undemocratic cabal with scant respect for the rule of
law in Haiti. The OAS’s Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
issued a statement expressing concern "over several key areas in
which the basic rights and freedoms of Haiti remain weak and imperiled,"
while Amnesty International has declared that "illegal and arbitrary
arrests" continue in Haiti and has named Rev. Jean-Juste a prisoner
of conscience. Renan Hedouville, director of the Lawyer’s Committee
for Individual Rights, has denounced the government before the OAS for
making arrests without warrants and holding suspects without charges
for longer than forty-eight hours, while also reporting that there have
been widespread accusations that women and girls have been raped by
ex-soldiers, a practice tragically reminiscent of the 1991-1994 coup
period, where such acts of sexual violence were frequent and almost
always went unpunished.
In perhaps the most important international condemnation of the interim
government, the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) voted once again on November
9 to postpone the restoration of normal ties with the Latortue administration,
stating that there will be "no compromise on the fundamental principles
of respect for human rights, due process and good governance."
If Barbados’ Prime Minister Owen Seymour Arthur and Grenada’s
Prime Minister Keith Mitchell had no qualms of conscious in attempting
to win Washington’s goodwill by being Judas to Haiti’s precarious
situation, the same was not true for Guyana’s doughty President
Bharrat Jagdeo and St. Lucia’s Prime Minister Kenny Anthony, both
of whom took highly principled stands on Haiti’s status. The latter
directly called on the Latortue government to put a "stop to the
harassment of the political opposition," in a clear reference to
the campaign of repression that it has waged against Lavalas supporters.
Haiti's failure to regain its seat in the Caribbean organization has
been an ongoing embarrassment to the Latortue government, and is particularly
important given the persistent relunctance of the UN and the OAS to
stand up to pressure from Washington and openly denounce the current
regime’s abuses being committed on the island. The CARICOM meeting
concluded with a commitment to work with other Latin American countries,
led by Brazil, to facilitate dialogue among the political factions in
Haiti. Hopefully this promised cooperation materializes and the rest
of the hemisphere, under the possible auspices of the OAS, takes a more
active role in protecting basic human rights and the rapid restoration
of democracy in Haiti.
MINUSTAH: An Opportunity Squandered
While MINUSTAH may well represent the best hope for averting the collapse
of the current Haitian government, it continues to be debilitated by
an under-fulfillment of pledged troop contributions, a phenomenon that
reflects a long-standing trend in UN peacekeeping: the assigned forces
are chronically under quota, their mission is too narrowly defined,
and is authorized for too brief a period, with donors' pledges frequently
not materializing. The World Bank has estimated Haiti's reconstruction
needs over the next two years to top $1.3 billion, and a separate emergency
appeal for $35 million was subsequently made to fund post-flood rebuilding
and allocate relief over the next six months. Currently, $1.1 billion
has been pledged, approximately 85 percent of the total, but funds can
be expected to arrive slowly, if at all, and may be curtailed if the
widespread instability which threatens the integrity of the reconstruction
process persists.
Resource constraints notwithstanding, MINUSTAH also has demonstrated
a shocking lack of political will in confronting the root causes of
the spiraling violence, and systematically has attempted to avoid potentially
dangerous high-profile engagements. In addition, MINUSTAH leaders have
taken a notably complacent approach towards the Latortue government’s
appalling human rights record – not only have MINUSTAH commanders
and the UN special representative to Haiti failed to vigorously denounce
that record, the force has at times provided a supporting role for illegal
government arrests and other actions that violate the rule of law.
In the arena of disarmament, UN military commanders have declared that
their mission cannot and will not include the containment of armed gangs,
despite the fact that its original mandate was to establish conditions
of basic stability to pave the way for new elections. Such a declaration
at a time when armed factions threaten the integrity of the Haitian
state, demonstrate a stunning degree of disengagement from the country's
political realities. In the absence of a renewed commitment of political
will and a promise to expand the force's mandate, even an increase in
troops will be unsuccessful in reinvigorating MINUSTAH. Without such
a commitment, which has been woefully absent in past attempts to institutionalize
democracy in Haiti, a serious risk exists that the central authority
will continue to crumble and that the Latortue regime will continue
to be a Mickey Mouse government— smug, arrogant and lawless. This
façade of legitimate authority will bring about an unimaginably
perilous crisis, further discrediting the UN’s already feeble
efforts and triggering a new surge of “boat people” towards
Florida.
It is essential that the UN and particularly the Security Council nations
immediately provide MINUSTAH with sufficient troops to reach its mandated
level and separate itself from the Latortue regime, which now must be
deemed as a failure that requires replacement rather than reform. The
length of the force's stay should also be extended to at least one year
and longer if possible, and its mission more robustly interpreted to
encompass disarming the armed factions that are intimidating Latortue’s
rule. Additionally, there is an urgent need for the Security Council
and the US to make one final effort to pressure the Latortue government
to abandon its attempt at rapprochement with the former military faction,
immediately end its campaign of illegal arrests, halt its persecution
of former Lavalas party members and bring to trial known perpetrators
of human rights abuses, including its Minister of Justice.
Perhaps most importantly, Washington should take a leading role in ensuring
that Haiti receives promised international contributions. Only such
a long-term pledge has the potential to break the cycle of repression,
disintegration and deepening poverty that Haiti so frequently has suffered
in the past, and continues to suffer to this day.
*********
This analysis was prepared by Jessica Leight, COHA Research Fellow.
Additional research supplied by Larry Birns, COHA Director
November 12, 2004
***********
The Council on Hemispheric Affairs, founded in 1975, is an independent,
non-profit, non-partisan, tax-exempt research and information organization.
It has been described on the Senate floor as being “one of the
nation’s most respected bodies of scholars and policy makers.”
For more information, please see our web page at www.coha.org; or contact
our Washington offices by phone (202) 223-4975, fax (202) 223-4979,
or email coha@coha.org.
|
|