ezili_sm_button
writings_sm_button
perform_sm_button
bio_sm_button
workshops_sm_button
contactus_sm_button
guest_bu_button
law_sm_button
merchan_bu_button
  ezilidanto@margueritelaurent.com  
BACK


Raoul Peck is no Spike.....so what!?
by Jafrikayiti

December 17, 2004

HLLN Note: The article below by Haitian Lawyers Leadership's, Jafrikayiti (Jean Saint-Vil), responds to points made in an article written by Raoul Peck entitled "Aristide is no Mandela" and sent to South African newspapers.The Peck article is posted at Windowsonhaiti.com (http://haitiforever.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4663#4663
******

Raoul Peck is no Spike Lee… so what!?

In 1997, at the height of his political career as Haitian Minister of
Culture welcoming hip-hop megastars the Fugees, I interviewed Raoul Peck in
Port-au-Prince. The subject of our brief exchange was the co-production of a
major motion picture about the Haitian revolution. I asked Minister Peck for
his thoughts on the idea floating around at the time that, following the
model of Spike Lee’s « Malcom X », a major effort be undertaken to raise
funds to produce a film on the Haitian Revolution. I took the license of
suggesting that the venture be a «Peck-Lee joint ». Although he duly
acknowledged the merit of the proposal, Minister Peck was quick to dismiss
it as a "good idea but…not likely to happen anytime soon” . “We are not
there yet" he also offered.

This was my first encounter with Raoul Peck, the politician. Over the next
few years, I would come across many other statements from politician Raoul
Peck whom I consider to be a radically different character than the
respected film-maker whose work I so appreciate.

In as much as his Director’s skills can be awe inspiring in Man by the Shore
or Lumumba, Peck’s tenure as Minister of Culture as well as the role he
subsequently adopted as merciless critic of his former political colleagues
have been huge disappointments; starting with his book “Monsieur le
Ministre”, in which Peck appears to shamelessly blame everyone but himself
for the dismal failure of the government he served in 1997 and up to the
first half of 1998. I found Peck’s endless rambling in that book especially
disappointing since I can remember how saddened I was when Wyclef Jean, back
in 1997, let wild rumours run unchecked that Minister Peck himself had
somehow participated in embezzlement of the Fugees’ concert profits. Truth
be told, I suspect that such profits in all likelihood never existed.

“Raoul Peck, the Minister of Culture, announced that the vast outdoor
concert had been a break-even venture; actually, on second thought, a
money-loser, a bit of accounting that seems as ridiculous to the Fugees as
it does to the Haitian people, some of whom are calling for Peck's immediate
removal
”. (http://www.papermag.com/magazine/mag_97/mag_aug97/wyclef/wyclef.html)

Sadly, Peck was to later emulate the same irresponsible behaviour as Wyclef
and, by his own erratic accusations against his former political associates,
prove that Haiti’s spoiled “elite” does indeed have an over-appetite for
public smearing of their compatriots. A habit that has certainly contributed
to the dire situation the nation finds itself in this our bicentennial year.

Peck’s latest attacks have targeted African and Afro-Caribbean vanguard
forces which, over the past few years, courageously stood up to the powers
in Europe and North-America that have masterminded the bicentennial
coup-kidnapping against Haiti. In November 2003, Peck published a text in
which he blasted “the Congressional Black Caucus, TransAfrica Forum and
other groups” for their continued support of Haiti’s constitutional
government led by President Jean-Bertrand Aristide. Peck’s latest diatribe,
dated December 16, 2004, went straight after South-African President Thabo
MBeki.

In essence Raoul Peck argues that President Aristide was “forced out as a
result of his errors of judgment in making decisions as a chief of state”.
To support this argument, Peck feels not the least bit compelled to provide
substantial evidence of Aristide’ supposedly unforgivable sins. Instead, he
graces us with hyperbolae like “his closest collaborators have been indicted
on drug trafficking charges in Florida”. As if Peck ignores that drug
trafficking has been and remains an integral part of the CIA’s operations
throughout Latin America. As if Peck isn’t aware that, in Haiti, the U.S
repeatedly uses and protects convicted murderers like Jean Pierre Baptiste
(Tatoune), Jodel Chamblain, drug dealers like Prosper Avril and Guy Phillipe
to conduct coup after coup…while claiming to be waging a “war on drugs”? How
many times has this so-called ‘war on drugs’ been used around the world to
topple or shape down regimes considered to have become too hostile or not
sufficiently compliant to Uncle Sam’s desiderata?

It is indeed disturbing to note Peck’s nonchalant “he had it coming”
response to the fact that, in 2004, the duly-elected Black president of his
native country had been, in the dead of night, surrounded by white U.S.
Marines and other co-conspiring foreign forces, shoved into an unmarked
plane and flown “back to Africa” – The abducted president and his spouse
were kept without knowledge of their own whereabouts for over 20 hours,
until they were to land in a hostile Central African Republic (CAR). Please
see Democracy Now’s coverage of this amazing story at www.democracynow.org.

Raoul Peck claiming that President Aristide is somehow the culprit of his
own forced removal from Haiti is not unlike throwing blame at a rape victim
for having probably enticed her assailant with skirts worn too high above
her knee. Of course, it is a ridiculous proposition Mr. Peck ! Especially,
in view of the fact that the historical record clearly shows that President
Aristide’s second overthrow by a Bush administration was planned well in
advance of his return to power in 2000. In fact, a full five days before
President Aristide even delivered his swearing-in speech, the Washington
post published these prophetic lines: « The most determined of these men,
with a promise of anonymity, freely express their desire to see the U.S.
military intervene once again, this time to get rid of Aristide and rebuild
the disbanded Haitian army. "That would be the cleanest solution," said one
opposition party leader. Failing that, they say, the CIA should train and
equip Haitian officers exiled in the neighboring Dominican Republic so they
could stage a comeback themselves.» Haiti Torn by Hope and Hatred As
Aristide Returns to Power by Edward Cody (Washington Post, February 2, 2001)
Peck claims in his “Aristide is no Mandela” that it is his “hope with this
article to help bring the truth about Aristide to South Africans”. Yet, just
a few lines after presenting himself as the ultimate revealer of “truth”,
quite disingenuously, Peck speaks of President Aristide’s 13 years in power.

Unfortunately, this type of blatant exaggeration has become the hallmark of
Anti-Aristidism masquerading as “ideologically-based opposition” in Haiti.

This blatant lack of intellectual honesty has caused Peck’s camp to lose
much of the respect they once enjoyed in the eyes of average Haitians. Thus,
it is not surprising if, a full 10 months after the coup, Peck’s own OPL
party remains a marginal element on the Haitian political landscape.

Obviously, and sadly so, whatever support Aristide’s Lavalas party did lose
after the coup was not taken up by his political opponents who only managed
to turn many people completely off the whole electoral democracy path.
Today, all the U.S. or French embassy- dependent parties that actively or
passively collaborated with the Franco-American cabal that conducted the Feb
29th coup remain patently unpopular.

Despite Raoul Peck’s creative math, the people of Haiti know and the
historical record shows that President Aristide spent – not 13 years – but
the following periods of time in power: from Feb 7, 1991 to September 29th
1991 – until overthrown by a bloody CIA masterminded coup d’état, after only
7 months in office, while former CIA Director George Bush the elder was in
the U.S. White House. Then President Aristide, returned to power by the
Clinton administration, served the last 16 months of his term (October 15,
1994 to February 7, 1996). That’s a total of 23 months served from a 5 year
presidential mandate. Barred from seeking a consecutive term in office,
President Aristide stood out the 1995 elections.His second mandate, obtained
by the ballot, not by coup, began February 7, 2001. This time around he
managed to resist for 3 years before being overthrown again - this time by
George Bush the lesser, with logistical help from France and Canada, on
February 29, 2004. Thus, the man spent a total of 5 truncated years in
power. Peck’s attempt to count as Aristide’s mandate, President René G.
Préval’s term, during which Peck himself served as Minister of Culture is
simply ridiculous. Obviously, to arrive at the 13 years he mentions in his
text, Peck had to have also added for good measure the 3 years President
Aristide spent in exile as a result of Bush the Elder’s 1991 coup.

No wonder Raoul Peck is outraged that “we have been hearing loud cries of
outrage from some of the black "elite" in the United States, South Africa
and the Caribbean about a "kidnapping". “Let's be serious!” admonishes our
self-described revealer of truth to the people of South-Africa. But, on this
December 16, 2004, 14th anniversary of the first democratic elections in
Haiti, Peck’s call sounds tragically hollow. If it ever manages to shake the
resolve of some weak puppet leader of one of the client states that
subscribe to neo-colonial clubs such as the “franco-phony”, it will
certainly not deviate seasoned Statesmen and Stateswomen like brother Thabo
Mbeki, sisters Congresswomen Maxine Waters, Barbara Lee or Prime Minister
Ralph Gonsalves. Rather than trying to break the historically-rooted
pan-African solidarity with Haiti’s genuine democratic camp, Haiti’s out of
touch petty bourgeoisie should take a cue from the heroism and steadfastness
of one Randall Robinson, who helped smuggle that cell phone to President
Aristide while he was still being held by his Franco-American kidnappers in
the CAR, thus forging a first opening for the truth about the tragic events
of 2004 to flow to the world.

Brother Raoul Peck’s Aristide-Mandela comparison may be ill-inspired but it
serves well to remind us that elder "Madiba" was himself, still not so long
ago, officially considered a “terrorist” by the very hypocrites who today
are falling all over themselves for an opportunity to be photographed with
him. If a young but perhaps too tragically eurocentric Raoul Peck sadly
allows himself to be perceived as a supporter of the 2004 Franco-American
coup, our aged African elder, the beloved Madiba, had the following words of
wisdom to share with us, not so long ago:

“we now live in a world where powerful countries - all of them so-called
democracies - manipulate multilateral bodies to the great disadvantage and
suffering of the poorer developing nations"
. And, specifically about
President Mbeki’s warm welcome offered to President Aristide, Madiba said:
“I should have come to see you but I don't want to appear to be competing
with President Mbeki. He's doing very well”.


So, instead of trying to sow division within the African family, brother
Raoul Peck, you should take a final cue from brother Danny Glover’s December
5, 2004 declaration where, in sharp contrast to your inappropriate attack
against brother Mbeki, Danny declares himself “gratified to see South Africa
and President Thabo Mbeki standing steadfast beside the Haitian people”.

Frankly Mr. Peck, we can’t afford to continue playing this fratricidal game
while, on the side of the imperialists, they continue to work in complete
synergy to crush the few gains Haiti has made on the path of democracy in
the last decades. You need not be Spike Lee. No more than President Aristide
need to be Mandela. We each have our own path to follow in the struggle dear
brother. Nonetheless, if you truly wish to stand for constitutional
democracy in Haiti, if you truly wish Haitians to live safe from the
murderous CIA-dependant military which President Aristide had the wisdom to
disband back in 1995, you must find the courage to admit that the
imperialist forces had taken you for a wicked ride. You need to make that
full stop and boldly take the required turn to join your brothers and
sisters "doing the right thing".

Please join us as we continue to say no to unelected Uncle Tom puppet
dictatorships in Haiti! No to all foreign occupations of Haiti ! No to a
return of the CIA’s bloody army in Haiti !Yes to the return of legal and
legitimate governance in Haiti, with President Aristide – until his legal
mandate expires naturally, without coup d’état or kidnapping.

Se pa kado blan te fè nou. Se san zansèt nou yo ki te koule. Amandla!

Jafrikayiti

“Depi nan Ginen bon Nèg ap ede Nèg!”
(brotherhood is as ancient as the
motherland)

About CARICOM’s resistance, see Dr. Kwame Nantambu’s “CARICOM-Haiti-U.S.
Relations” http://www.trinicenter.com/kwame/2004/2110.htm
-------------------------------------------------------

Jafrikayiti (Jean Saint-Vil) is author of “LAFIMEN: Listwa Pèp Ayisyen Depi
Nan Ginen
”, 2003 and "Viv Bondye ! Aba Relijyon!", 2000. His regular column
"KozeNèfTankouZeFre" is published under the Port Haiti.com network
(http://www.i-port.net/sd-in-j/ ). He is a recognized Ottawa community radio
host (www.chuo.fm and CKCUFM.com). A B.Sc. (Hon. Biology) graduate of the
University of Waterloo (Canada), he is a senior Program Officer at the
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

www.jafrikayiti.com
******

campaigns_button
different_button
_______________
Denounce Canada's role in Haiti: Canadian officials Contact Infomation
_______________

Urge the Caribbean Community to stand firm in not recognizing the illegal Latortue regime:

Selected CARICOM Contacts
Key
CARICOM
Email
Addresses
zilibutton Slide Show at the July 27, 2004 Haiti Forum Press Conference during the DNC in Boston honoring those who stand firm for Haiti and democracy; those who tell the truth about Haiti; Presenting the Haiti Resolution, and; remembering Haiti's revolutionary legacy in 2004 and all those who have lost life or liberty fighting against the Feb. 29, 2004 Coup d'etat and its consequences
     
 
BACK
Ezilidanto Writings| Performances | Bio | Workshops | Contact Us | Guests |law_sm_button | Merchandise
2003 Marguerite Laurent